Candida auris in US Correctional Facilities

Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that typically affects patients in healthcare settings. Data on C. auris cases in correctional facilities are limited but are needed to guide public health recommendations. We describe cases and challenges of providing care for 13 patients who were transferred to correctional facilities during January 2020–December 2022 after having a positive C. auris specimen. All patients had positive specimens identified while receiving inpatient care at healthcare facilities in geographic areas with high C. auris prevalence. Correctional facilities reported challenges managing patients and implementing prevention measures; those challenges varied by whether patients were housed in prison medical units or general population units. Although rarely reported, C. auris cases in persons who are incarcerated may occur, particularly in persons with known risk factors. Measures to manage cases and prevent C. auris spread in correctional facilities should address setting-specific challenges in healthcare and nonhealthcare correctional environments.

Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that typically affects patients in healthcare settings.Data on C. auris cases in correctional facilities are limited but are needed to guide public health recommendations.We describe cases and challenges of providing care for 13 patients who were transferred to correctional facilities during January 2020-December 2022 after having a positive C. auris specimen.All patients had positive specimens identified while receiving inpatient care at healthcare facilities in geographic areas with high C. auris prevalence.Correctional facilities reported challenges managing patients and implementing prevention measures; those challenges varied by whether patients were housed in prison medical units or general population units.Although rarely reported, C. auris cases in persons who are incarcerated may occur, particularly in persons with known risk factors.Measures to manage cases and prevent C. auris spread in correctional facilities should address setting-specific challenges in healthcare and nonhealthcare correctional environments.

OUTBREAKS AND INVESTIGATIONS
We investigated all reported clinical and screening cases of C. auris among patients who transferred to or resided in a jail, state prison, or federal prison in the United States after having a positive C. auris specimen during January 2020-December 2022.We used established CDC case definitions for clinical and screening cases (8).We collected epidemiologic information for each case and calculated basic descriptive statistics for C. auris case type, type of healthcare facility where the positive specimen was collected, patient age, patient health conditions at the time of transfer to a correctional facility, type of correctional facility where the patient was transferred, and type of housing arrangements.Through emails and phone calls, we provided openended questions to health departments, departments of corrections, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons about challenges with patient management and infection control and prevention for C. auris that they encountered or that were reported by correctional facilities.

Patient and Facility Characteristics
During January 2020-December 2022, a total of 13 patients who had a positive C. auris specimen were transferred to or resided in a correctional facility (Table ).Eleven patients had screening specimens, and the other 2 had clinical C. auris specimens from urine.All patients were under the custody of a state or federal prison when they had their first positive specimen.Twelve patients were receiving inpatient medical care at offsite healthcare facilities (i.e., in the community), and one patient was receiving inpatient care in an onsite prison medical unit.None of the patients were under the custody of a jail.The healthcare facilities were in Texas, Florida, New Jersey, and Indiana, and all were in geographic areas where C. auris is commonly reported (9).
Median patient age was 55 years (range 26-66 years) (Table ).Twelve of 13 patients were men.At the time of transfer, 3 patients were on mechanical ventilation, and 5 had >1 indwelling medical device, such as central venous catheters and tracheostomy tubes.All but 1 patient had chronic health conditions, including chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic cardiovascular disease, and chronic wounds; chronic kidney disease (n = 8) and diabetes (n = 7) were the most common chronic health conditions.
Patients were transferred from offsite healthcare facilities to prisons in Texas, Florida, New Jersey, In- diana, and Missouri.Among 11 patients for whom detailed transfer or residence information was available, 1 was transferred directly to a general population housing unit within a prison and housed with roommates, and 10 were initially transferred to or resided in onsite medical units located within prisons.Among those initially transferred to a medical unit, 1 patient was housed in a single-patient room in the medical unit and died approximately 1 week after transfer, although it was not known whether the death was caused by C. auris infection.One was initially housed in a single-patient room in a medical unit for 2 months before being transferred to a general population unit and housed with roommates.
The remaining 8 patients remained in onsite medical units as of last follow-up because of continuing medical needs unrelated to C. auris colonization.

Challenges Encountered and Public Health Responses for Managing C. auris Cases
Correctional facility staff reported several challenges in managing C. auris cases and implementing infection prevention and control (IPC) and response measures in prisons.Staff reported difficulties isolating patients in onsite medical units because of a lack of individual medical isolation rooms and concerns for patient well-being during prolonged isolation.Three facilities reported working with health departments to conduct colonization screening for patients at high risk with overlapping stays in the units.One additional C. auris case was identified through these screening efforts, although information about the scope and completeness of screening was not available.Facilities that conducted screening also noted concerns about ensuring voluntary consent for screening participation, given that incarcerated patients might not feel that refusal was an option.Some facilities also noted that nonmedical staff and incarcerated workers who perform environmental cleaning and disinfection in medical units did not have adequate training in IPC and the proper use of personal protective equipment.
Facilities also reported concerns about how to minimize risk to roommates or other close contacts of patients with C. auris in general population units and concerns about patients with C. auris experiencing stigma or threats from other incarcerated persons or staff.Facilities addressed those concerns by housing patients with roommates who did not have medical risk factors for C. auris colonization and providing education about C. auris to roommates and others assigned to housing in close proximity to the patient.Facilities reported challenges providing soap and alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) to patients and other incarcerated persons because of internal policies restricting providing those items for security reasons.
State health departments reported difficulties coordinating across multiple jurisdictions and agencies (e.g., coordinating colonization screening with the department of corrections, prison management, and contracted medical providers).One state health department reported overcoming these challenges by leveraging a preexisting relationship between the state health department and the department of corrections, which enabled rapid information sharing and decision-making between departments.Facilities also noted challenges in ensuring that patients' C. auris status was consistently communicated to relevant staff within the facility and during transfers to other correctional facilities or to offsite healthcare settings.

Discussion
This report describes cases of C. auris reported among patients in US correctional facilities.Cases occurred among patients in geographic areas with high C. auris prevalence and with recent hospital admissions, consistent with prior reports that C. auris is predominantly transmitted and acquired in healthcare environments (2,3).Although underlying conditions were common, not all patients had typical risk factors for C. auris at the time of transfer back to the correctional facility.However, data about risk factors were not collected systematically and did not necessarily reflect possible risk factors present at the time of C. auris acquisition.Although all but one patients in this report had their first positive C. auris specimens identified at offsite hospitals, transmission in onsite medical units was not fully assessed because comprehensive screening of healthcare contacts was not conducted for all cases.In the future, comprehensive screening in response to cases in correctional medical units could help determine whether transmission is occurring in these settings.
This report highlights unique challenges to C. auris patient management and IPC in correctional medical settings.Although no setting-specific guidance for C. auris response in correctional facilities exists, strategies outlined in MDRO containment guidance for healthcare settings would apply (10,11).Those guidelines focus on ensuring adherence to recommended IPC practices, conducting screening of healthcare contacts or new admissions on the basis of the local epidemiology, and communication about patients' C. auris status during transfers to other facilities.Specific guidance for different facility types (e.g., nursing homes, long-term acute care hospitals, and dialysis clinics) should be adapted for correctional facility medical units on the basis of the type of unit and acuity of care provided (10)(11)(12).Strong communication and collaboration between public health agencies and correctional facilities can increase awareness about resources needed to implement IPC policies and facilitate timely response to MDROs.Facilities could work with local health departments to proactively assess their IPC practices and plan C. auris response activities after a case is identified (13).Health departments can also share local epidemiologic information to guide practices in correctional medical units, such as screening.
Risk for C. auris transmission in nonhealthcare settings is not completely understood, but persons in nonhealthcare settings generally lack typical risk factors for C. auris (3).No evidence exists to suggest that incarcerated patients colonized with C. auris should not be discharged to the facility's general population.Disposition and decisions to discharge patients from medical units should be based on clinical criteria and healthcare need, not on C. auris status alone (10).Management for patients in general population units could draw from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, tuberculosis, and other corrections-specific infectious disease guidance, which focus on routine health education and providing soap or ABHS to patients and close contacts, such as roommates (5,6,(14)(15)(16).ABHS was provided in many facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic, and such policies could be adapted to ensure access to ABHS (17).Screening of contacts, such as those with frequent inpatient healthcare exposures, could be considered in specific situations, such as those outlined in MDRO containment guidance for residential care settings (11).Housing patients in general population units with low-risk roommates, such as those without underlying medical conditions or indwelling medical devices, could further reduce infection risk.Communication of MDRO status should always occur when a patient is transferred to offsite healthcare facilities or to different correctional facilities.To reduce the risk for stigma, knowledge of a patient's MDRO status should be restricted to staff who need this information to ensure that the patient is housed and receives medical care according to recommended IPC principles.
One limitation of this report is that all cases in incarcerated patients may not have been included because C. auris case detection and reporting may be incomplete and incarceration status is not a part of routine case reporting.Data on patient medical conditions also were collected in a nonsystematic manner and only for those present at the time of transfer, not at the time C. auris was acquired; some patients may have had risk factors for C. auris that were not reported (3).Information about onsite medical units (e.g., bed counts, acuity of care, and infection control compliance) also was not systematically collected but could improve characterization of potential facility-level risk factors for C. auris transmission.Furthermore, assessing where transmission occurred was not possible because persons can be colonized for a prolonged period, C. auris screening information was not available for offsite hospitals, and comprehensive screening was not conducted in all onsite medical units.
Although uncommon, C. auris colonization or infection may occur in persons who are incarcerated, particularly persons with known C. auris risk factors and recent healthcare encounters in geographic areas with high C. auris prevalence.Measures to manage cases and prevent C. auris spread in correctional facilities should account for the unique challenges of implementing recommended IPC and response measures and caring for patients with C. auris in healthcare and nonhealthcare environments within correctional settings.

Table .
Characteristics of 13 patients who were discharged to correctional facilities after having a positive Candida auris specimen,